Review of the 2013 SYM CityCom 300i

October, 2012


SYM CityCom 300i Rear Luggage RackUpdate – Dec. 2012
A proprietary rear luggage rack is available for the CityCom 300i.


TheCityCom 300i from SYM is back in the US market after a few years absence.  SYM has a new US distributor and the mess of the Carter Brother’s situation is being slowly cleared away (click here for more info). I last reviewed the CityCom in July of 2009 and liked the scooter. Marty at Go Moto in Minneapolis just got a 2013 example in his shop and was kind enough to make it available to me for several days to check out.

Sanyang Industries is based in Taiwan and has been around since 1961. They have over 2,400 employees and are marketed in the USA as SYM (SanYang Motors). I have reviewed several of their scooters and have been impressed with their design and quality.

Those of you unfortunate enough to have suffered through my often ranting reviews know that I’m a HUGE fan of “do -everything” scooters. Machines that can handle city traffic and highway speeds in comfort with adequate cargo capacity, good fuel economy and good performance. In the past year, we have seen the arrival of the Kymco People GTi and the Piaggio BV 350. Now, with the return of the SYM CityCom, we have another excellent choice for those seeking one scooter to fill all their riding needs. 

What’s Changed Since 2009 with the CITYCOM?

Well… that depends on which CityCom you are asking about. SYM has some newer engine designs in it’s 300-class scooters in other countries. I have heard 280cc as opposed to the current 263cc and more power. This is NOT what is being imported to the US… for now. When I asked about this, the very straightforward response was one of cost. The 2013 US-version CityCom has an MSRP of $4,699. Significantly less than the Kymco People GTi300 or the Piaggio BV350. The newer, more powerful drivetrain would raise the price considerably. There HAVE been upgrades to the seat, mirrors, brakes and exhaust.

Speedometer Reading/Speed/Fuel Economy

These are the questions, aside from “How much does it cost?”, that usually get asked first. Our scooter reviews include testing with GPS because most scooter speedometers are not very accurate. The vast majority of scooters have speedometers that read very optimistically – usually 10 – 15% optimistic. The 2013 CityCom is one of them, at about 11% optimistic. That means at an indicated 30 MPH, the GPS was indicating 27MPH,at 60 MPH indicated on the speedometer, the actual speed was 53 MPH. This is a little disappointing as the 2009 CityCom we tested was only 3% optimistic. The odometer was spot on, indicating 10 miles after a GPS verified 10 mile ride.  

The top speed (GPS verified) with a 220 pound rider was 76MPH. The indicated speed was 85 MPH. The 2009 CityCom we tested did 79MPH, BUT, that scooter was broken in and this one was not. After some miles, I wouldn’t be surprised if the 2013 CityCom was also capable of faster speeds. 

Fuel economy was outstanding at 68 MPG. This is 4 MPG better than the 2009 we tested. The riding was mixed with about 60% around town and 40% on the highway. Again, after break-in, this number may well improve. Evolution of engine design, manufacturing quality and the fuel injection makes these numbers possible. My “old” carbureted 250cc scooters had fuel economy in the 50ish MPG range. Nothing to sneeze at, but high 60s is a really great place to be with a scooter that is highway capable.

Features

I elected to compare the SYM CityCom 300i with the new Kymco People GTi300 and the Piaggio BV350. All three scooters are excellent do-everything machines that share some characteristics: big wheels, relatively short wheelbase, liquid cooling, fuel injection, upright riding position and modern (as opposed to retro) design. I thought about including the Kymco People GTi200 because it’s closer in specification to the CityCom, both have about 21 horsepower and the GTi200 has an MSRP of $4,899. However, most dealers are not stocking the 200 under the assumption that their customers will want the 300 and it’s extra horses. Glancing at the comparison chart, the scooters are similar in specification other than price and horse power. More about both of those in a bit. 

The dash on the CityCom has both analog and digital displays. The analog speedometer is in the center, with the tachometer on the left, and temperature on the right. There is a digital pod with the fuel gauge, time, odometer and trip meter. There are indicator lights for turn signals, high beam, oil level, low fuel and a “check engine” light. The speedometer is biased to miles with kilometers smaller on the inner ring. Everything is easy to see even in sunlight and the basics can be read at a glance. The multi-function ignition switch has the added security feature of a “blocking” door that closes over the key-hole making it difficult to “punch out” the ignition.

The updated mirrors on the 2013 CityCom look very nice and provide a decent field of view for what is going on behind one. The CityCom comes with a mid-sized windshield that is well integrated into the design of the scooter. There are also small “flairs” on the front body panel directly below the windshield that help to keep the windblast off one’s hands.

(Click) Did you hear that? The RANT switch just got turned on. One of my primary considerations in naming a scooter “do-everything” is native luggage capacity. I’ll even go so far as to count stock rear racks that make it easy to mount a trunk. I also want adequate wind protection. The Kymco People GTi has no windshield, and until very recently, no aftermarket one to get. The GTi also has nothing but a shallow tray under the seat. It does, however, come from the factory with a trunk. If you don’t like that trunk, it’s not difficult to mount a bigger one. The Piaggio BV350 has a factory windshield, but it’s a little small. There’s no trunk from the factory, but the underseat storage is good and adding a trunk would be easy. The SYM CityCom has HUGE underseat storage and a smallish glove box. The CityCom also has a better stock windshield than the Piaggio. What it doesn’t have is any kind of rear luggage rack. The underseat storage is really well thought out. I was able to get my melon-head sized (2XL) Nolan full-face helmet in there and easily close the seat. More importantly (the helmet is, after all, on my head when I’m riding and I don’t need to store it under the seat) I could easily get my man-purse (large Victorinox messenger bag) under the seat. During my review, I did a Costco “catch-up” trip (stuff I forgot) with my wife on the back of the scooter. “Are you nuts?” she said, “How are we going to get anything home?” I told her not to worry and threw a cloth bag under the seat. We picked up a lot of stuff and I was easily able to handle it all between the large underseat area and hanging one bag from the hook by the glove box.

I contacted Alliance Powersports about the rear luggage rack and was assured that they are working on it and will have something here as soon as they can. There is a nice rear rack available overseas that would make it a snap to mount a trunk. With that addition, and the already excellent stock windshield, the SYM CityCom would have the best do-everything configuration of any scooter currently available in the USA. (Click) I’ve turned the RANT switch back to off.    

The SYM CityCom has good lighting with dual 35-watt headlights and conventional signals and brake lights. Maybe the next update willl have some LED or even HID goodies, but for the time being lighting is just fine. Night-time riding was not a problem with the dual headlights giving an excellent field of vision. The locking fuel cap is conveniently located. Not having the filler under the seat is nice for a scooter like this because when I’m commuting alone I often have “stuff” bungeed on the passenger seat and taking everything off to get at the fuel is a hassle.

The CityCom functioned flawlessly during our review time. SYM’s reputation for quality is well deserved. All the switches, controls,  latches, and so forth are of good quality and will probably prove to be quite durable over time. I know a few people who still have their 2009 CityCom scooters and they hold up well.  

Riding Impressions

I picked up the CityCom at GoMoto and was immediately reminded that this is a tall scooter and I am NOT a tall person. With my 30 inch inseam, I am used to relying on my 220 pound girthy build to compress scooters down to “touching” height. The best I could manage on the CityCom was a tip-toe at stops. The CityCom is very well balanced with a low center of gravity and it’s not tough to hold it up at a stop even without being flat-footed. The gorgeous young lady in the picture (Really, you didn’t think I’d make you look at a 220 pound old man when she has a similar inseam for demonstration purposes…. did you?) had no problem handling the scooter at stops. That being said, the CityCom is the tallest of the three scooters in the comparison chart above. For me, every aspect aside from seat height was ergonomically PERFECT on the CityCom. My hands “fell” right on the controls. The seat is among the most comfortable stock seats I’ve ever been on. For me, the stock windshield was the perfect height and width. I would say that the SYM CityCom 300i is as comfortable as the Piaggio BV350 and may even be more comfortable. Both have better ergonomics than the Kymco People GTi, especially in the seat.

Turn the key, wait for the system to cycle, grab a brake lever and hit the starter button – the CityCom fires right up and settles into a smooth idle. Fuel injection rocks. Acceleration from a stop is smooth and quick. Not as quick as SYM’s own HD200 up to about 20 MPH, but the mid-range on the CityCom is very nice. This is one area that both the Kymco People GTi 300 and the Piaggio BV350 are much stronger than the CityCom. Go back up to that comparison chart and look at horsepower and, more importantly, pounds per horsepower. The CityCom is the heaviest of the three and the lowest in horsepower. It shows. The CityCom is also $700 less than GTi and $800 less than the BV. Top speed is also a lot less on the CtiyCom. What this means to you as a scooter rider depends on what you want/need from your scooter and what you are willing to spend.

The last time I rode a CityCom (2009) the brakes were just adequate. The 2013 CityCom is definitely a step up from the older version in braking performance. I found the front and rear discs to be strong and easy to modulate. Probably because I was paying extra attention to the brakes, I did my panic stop tests several times and there was no fade or change in input required. Handling was very good and proved that one doesn’t have to compromise (much) to get a scooter that feels as good on 25 MPH parkways as it does on 65MPH highways. The combination of big wheels, relatively short wheelbase and upright steering geometry can feel just fine at a wide range of speeds. Of course the CityCom takes more effort on those twisty parkways than a Genuine Buddy with 10 inch wheels does. It also doesn’t have the “flowing” highway ride of a Burgman 650. HOWEVER neither of those scooters feels very good on the other end of the performance perspective. Yes, I have ridden a Buddy on the highway, on fairly long rides at fairly high speeds. Skittish is being kind. Yes, I have ridden a Burgamn 650 Executive on slow twisty parkways in heavy traffic. Wallowing is being kind. The CityCom will feel pretty good in either situation and just about everything in between.

Passenger accommodations are quite nice on the CityCom. My wife Bev thought a backrest would be nice, but said the seat was very comfortable, the foot-pegs were at just the right position, and the grab-rail was handy. Of course adding a rear luggage rack and trunk with a backrest makes the passenger area about perfect.

I didn’t get any really long rides in during my time with this scooter, but I did manage a few jaunts on twisty roads without a lot of other traffic and the CityCom was fun. Something that can’t always be said of such a practical ride.      

Fit and Finish

The 2009 CityCom was an impressive machine so far as build quality goes and the 2013 version is just as good if not a touch better. The 2013 version is available in white, red, grey and dark grey or what SYM calls flat black. It’s the grey version that I rode. The quality of the paint was excellent. Fit of the body panels is outstanding. Every component appears to be a high quality and very well put together. As I’ve said many times previously, good scooters out of Taiwan are as good as scooters from anyplace in the world. I know the flat black and grey are “safe” colors for dealers to stock, but I would like to see the red and white in person. Based on the quality I’ve seen, I’d not be surprised if they were just plain gorgeous.

The overall design of the CityCom really resonates with me. I know this is largely a question of personal taste, but the CityCom is one of the few scooters that I think looks good from any angle, even the back. The rear luggage rack we all hope will make it the USA does NOT really impact the look of the scooter in a negative way. The lines stay mostly as original and if one selects a good quality trunk like a SHAD, popping the trunk off when not needed will leave a very clean looking scooter.

The quality of the 2009 CityCom was high and it certainly looks like the 2013 will continue at the same level.  

Conclusions

For a conclusion, I’d like to jump back to the comparisons we’ve been making. If you are considering a do-everything scooter, answer a few question for yourself honestly. What is your real need? How much regular riding will be at city speeds? How much at highway speeds? What time of day? If you live in an area like Minneapolis, the highways are mostly 20 MPH with short bursts of 60 MPH during the rush hours. How about weekend trips? I know a fair number of people who will not consider the City Com as compared to the Kymco People GTi 300 and Piaggio BV350 just because of the power and top speed difference. I admit that I’m “hooked” on my own GTi 300 and make use of the scooter as a tourer for purely recreational purposes. I’ve also invested considerable time and resources in customizing my GTi and still don’t have a machine as comfortable as a CityCom. If you are really looking for a machine that will cover you in any commuting situation, city or highway, with comfort, reliability and efficient operation, look at a CityCom. Get the rear luggage rack, mount a SHAD 40 – 48 liter trunk, and enjoy many miles and years of use. All for hundreds less than the next closest choice. If you’ve just gotta have the extra horses, you probably haven’t read this far anyway.

David L. Harrington

UPDATE A Proprietary Rear Luggage Rack is Available for the CityCom 300i

Alliance Powersports, the USA importer/distributor of SYM, has announced the availability of a rear luggage rack made specifically for the SYM CityCom 300i. As mentioned in the rant under “Features” above, this was the one component missing from the CityCom to make it an outstanding do-everything machine. That’s the good news. The not-so-good news is that the MSRP on the rear rack is $179.99. Add a nice big topcase like the SHAD 48 at $300 and you’ll need $480 added to the cost of your CityCom 300i to bring it up to snuff. Even with the smaller SHAD 40 pictured above you’ll need to slap another $365 onto your investment in the CityCom. Alliance assured me that they are continuing to evolve their accessory offerings and that they wanted to bring a rack to the market as soon as possible. I hope this means something in the $100 range in the future. At least Alliance is listening to their USA customer base so far as accessories are concerned which is more than I can say for some other brands (I’m talking about you, Kymco).